Friday, 19 April 2019
How to modify a Suzuki starter solenoid for usage on a TR1
As it is usually a solenoid for a plethora of cars, all you really have to do is find one of the 5mm holes in the face and thread it to M6.
Then find an M6 bolt of the right length and bolt it to the cases.
Strictly speaking this wouldn't be necessary, but once the solenoid is a bit worn or the starter mechanics are a bit stiff, it might not be able to pull the hook all the way in and as such not engage the starter gears fully. Another thing: the long stud is the one where the battery wire goes, the short one goes to the starter.
Friday, 14 December 2018
Carburettors - more than you wanted to know (using the example of Mikuni TM38s)
At first, let's flog a dead horse by having a look at the following schematic:
|
| Source: Mikuni Corp, 2012 |
Let's just simply follow the carb slide through a usual day at work and identify the problems I encountered. (and most likely you did too, because quite frankly otherwise you probably wouldn't be reading this!)
For coldstart we obviously need to pull the choke knob and enrich the mixture and then run the bike (mainly) on the pilot jet and the additional choke jet. There's mainly two things aside from the choke affecting the mixture at this point and that's the pilot jet and the slide cutout. (called throttle valve in the schematic above) Now it should be obvious that the smaller the slide cutout the less air goes through at the same height of the slide, also the slide cutout basically determines how steep the curve rises that determines how much air gets to the engine at very low slide opening. This (within the limits of the engine) determines how "snappy" an engine will feel to the user. Additionally a smaller slide cutout will help to keep things more moderate and make jetting the pilot easier.
Real world example: a VM38-9 has got 2.5mm slide cut-out and a TM38-86 has got 4mm. The jetting on a Yamaha XV1000/1100 engine is pretty close in both instances, but trust me, a TM38 with the bigger slide cutout will feel a lot snappier.
Pitfalls (or also why you shouldn't start jetting from the bottom up): For rather obvious reasons it would be very tempting to start jetting from the bottom up, because then even if everything else fails, you at least would end up with a decent idle. And here comes the catch: as I pointed out before the schematic above only applies, if everything is working perfectly and even then the whole system is rather dynamic, meaning if your jetting is off, it simply doesn't add up. Assuming that for example your mainjet is dramatically oversized, it will overlay and obscure incorrect (lean) jetting in other areas. The art of jetting carbs is knowing some recipes, which usually work and then apply some common sense, e.g. if you run a #300 main-jet and the smallest pilot jet IIRC a #12.5 and your bike is still running so rich it will fire up without using the choke, there is a strong reason to believe that maybe your pilot jet is not the reason. Let's assume you get past this point and your jetting is somewhere in the vicinity of #20 pilot and a #185 main-jet. (Seems to be roughly the golden numbers for a Yamaha XV with a TM38, when sucking through the frame with a correctly sized airfilter and a free flowing exhaust.) Yet still it seems to idle weirdly when cold and once hot it will race to stupidly high rpm or even worse, when really hot will fall on its face again and not idle properly. The next thing is to look at the slide height: One of the standard pitfalls to compensate an overrich pilot is to raise the slide until it will idle just fine. This will then result in climbing idle for a bit only to have the bike lose idle once it has warmed through.
Next let's look at mid throttle openings. As stated before when the slide opens, the slide cutout is the main determining factor for how quickly the amount of air increases that gets into the engine. In parallel, as can be seen in the picture above, the carb needle isn't a straight control rod either, but is tapered. And now this is where things get tricky, because there's a lot of things that can be adjusted at the same time and even though on paper the results in AFR will be comparable the consistency of maintaining said target AFR. This brings us to the resulting question: Which options are there and what does what?
- The needle taper controls the steepness of the curve (progression). A thinner needle will mean a richer initial mixture and depending on how steep the needle is, it will mean also affect how rich the mixture is at max. slide opening and thus affect the main-jet.
- The clip position will set up where the starting point on the taper is. This can be very helpful, if you run a needle with a relatively flat taper, but almost impossible to use with a needle with a steep taper as even small increases dramatically change the effective diameter of the needle in the needle jet. (And that's completely ignoring the effects of worn carburettor needles, which may have a ridge worn into them at one point...) It has to be noted that some carbs come with needle shims to somewhat compensate for this, when quite literally the setting changes that can be achieved with the clips are too coarse.
- Lastly the needle jet, this is the only linear modifier in this equation. A bigger needle jet will quite simply increase the amount of fuel all the way from bottom to top.
|
| Source: Mikuni Corp, 2012 |
The last stop in our journey is full throttle. Even though this is the point,
where the most can go wrong, it's also the easiest to jet. Following some
gutt-feeling and experience one usually starts this "a tad" richer than is
expected to be right and once the bike has warmed up, literally just hammers
the proverbial snot out of the engine by doing full throttle pulls. Installing
smaller mainjets until the performance can be felt to go down, pinging occurs
or the oil-temp goes through the roof. (Usually it''s a combination of all
three, but with a bit of careful testing one can keep this within safe limits
at the very first point of the list.) With the orifice of a main jet being so
vastly bigger than all of the other jets that's also why you usuall start
there and try to get the mains right for a start as mistakes there will
trickle down all the way and even affect pilot jetting.
So where does this post come from: Basically I was trying to organize
my thoughts and trying to work out, what exactly needs to be tackled to get
the TM38 carbs on my Everyday TR1 working perfectly. The situation is as
follows: Bike idles fine when cold and up to a certain temperature, even
though the RPMs vary a bit, once really hot (as in above 110 degrees C of
oiltemperature) it completely falls on its face and will only idle when the
slide is lifted a bit, clearly indicating an over-rich pilot. At the same time
when up to temperature, there will be a certain amount of pinging at low (1/4
to 1/2) throttle opening indicating a relatively lean mixture at that and the
mainjet is quite substantially larger (#185) than on my old VM38-9 carbs
(#165), even though the effect is less felt at wider throttle openings.
Following the long winded text from above everything is pointing towards a
somewhat too lean needle and as the problem isn't really linear (especially as
the main-jet is actually about right, keeping the engine oil-cool, no
detonation, power seems about right and the plugs aren't fouling), it all
points towards the needle I am using isn't perfectly right for the
application. As I actually ordered the new needles before finding the chart
above, I now have a set of 6FJ40 needles to play around with. (Once the snow
and salt are gone, some serious testing will commence!) I expect to finally be
able to decrease the size of the pilot by one size and go back to a #20 and
overall experience lower engine-oil-temps as the bike isn't running on a lean
midrange.
Overview on the stock jetting of various Mikuni VM and TM carbs:
Wednesday, 17 May 2017
The other XS Triple Sidecar - how to convert to points and...
The difference between genius and stupid ideas is often just a point of view thing. Most people I know wouldn't want to fit a sidecar to a motorcycle, I think it's absolutely grand. Same goes for XS750/850 riders and points ignitions. Generally everybody wants to convert to electronic ignition for the apparent benefits, as such there's quite a few explanations out there on how to convert to electronic ignition on a 750 loom, but not a single one on how to go the other way. Well, now there is.
That's what I started with at 8:30 in the morning in my dad's garage.
The 4-pin-connector of the points-ignition on the engine.
And its 6-pin counterpart on the 850 loom.
Pinned out the 4-pin-connector on an old loom.
And did the same with the 6-pin-connector on the 850 loom. As the looms strictly speaking work the same, it's no big deal, as you just have extra switched +12V and ground wires and the other four (3 coils and neutral) are the same.
Insulate the two open terminals and that's the conversion done. As easy as that.
Getting the old r/r-unit off, without removing the battery tray is next to impossible so Markus fitted the new one inside the battery tray, because the space was empty anyway as he used a car-battery in the sidecar.
While we were at it, made some new ground wires, because you can never have too good ground on a bike.
The old BOSCH-headlight I used is a tad smaller, so fitting everything inside was going to be a bit of a challenge, especially as it came off my XS750 and that mostly used bullet-connectors, where as the 850 loom has got a lot more multi-connectors, which are super for wiring up, but a bit of a pain space-wise.
Carbs are in.
Quick oilchange, before startup as I had to take off the filter housing anyway, because of the oilcooler still missing on the bike.
That's the level of clean I want to see in a filter housing (and an oilpan), but you know that already.
That was quite literally the second startup of the 750, just cranked it over once before to make sure I have oilpressure etc and it fired right up.
And that's my hairy arse on the first testride right out of the gates at my dad's humble domicile ...
... aaaaand coming back. (I've repeated that process a few times - it's pretty awesome!)
What you can't see in the videos: a 25kg (50 pound) bag of sand on the seat as the sidecar is really light and just loves to climb.
So what's left to do: Get a new 16" sidecar tyre, dial in the carbs, tighten up the exhaust and then find someone who's after a nice learner sidecar. It's all in the (German) papers, so if sidecars are your thing, drop me a line and we'll work something out.
Saturday, 18 June 2016
XS400 to 450 Project (part 1) - Introduction
So what's the most logical thing? Go big. Unfortunately the XS400 series started out as an XS360 and was bored out to be more competitive. That said, a 15mm gudgeon pin is definitely lightweight, but not exactly durable and the conrod's small end is a bit flimsy to put it mildly and has a distinct tendency towards deformation.
Luckily a bit of research yielded some very, very interesting results. Now Suzuki's GS500 E is a pretty awesome parts donor, its 74mm diameter pistons being a nice upgrade over the stock 69mm items. With bore and stroke being rather close 52.4mm on the XS and 56.6mm on the GS500 E the pistons are actually pretty close in their overall dimensions.
Now a bit more internet research yielded an interesting result in the shape of FJ1100/1200 and XJR1200/1300 conrods to lower the pistons as the compression height of GS500 pistons is a tad higher than the stock XS400 items.
XS400 cylinders in the back, GS500 in the front.
An otherwise stock XS400 crank and two XJR1200 conrods in the front.
The money shot: The new piston is almost bigger than the bore in the cylinder, with the sleeve removed!
The XJR1200 conrod on the crank.
... and installed.
Saturday, 21 May 2016
A friend in need is...
This one was interesting though. It turned out, that the actual clutch cable holder must have been broken for quite a while and now finally had a hot date with the chain, when the two of the got a bit more intimate than was to be desirable for Mr. clutch lever.
So after a bit of bending and hammering the whole lot looked substantially better than before. A little drop of the magic blue-glue (aka. TIG-welding) and then a bit of grinding with a die grinder returned the cable mount back to usable shape.
I do admit that the candy-colour-paintjob still appeals.
Thursday, 5 May 2016
One from the workshop - Buell XB oilpump-sprocket (Ölpumpenritzel - ÖPR)
Wrong.
Well not totally. The oilpump-sprocket-swapping was indeed a fifteen minute affair, just as it would be on a Sportster. Unfortunately it required taking the better part of the bike apart.
9:45am: Starting from the top
Lots of 'leccy stuff
Airbox removed - god this bike would look sooooo cool, without the tank and just with a K&N poking through a sheetmetal lid!
10:30(-ish): Good vibrations kill EVERYTHING
Front engine hanger.
Engine lowered to remove the rocker cover.
Rocker cover and rockers removed (p.i.t.a. job)
1:30pm - (post lunchbreak) camcover removed
1:35pm - Oilpump sprocket removed
Inlet cam of the front cylinder, intermediate gear and to the bottom-right the oilpump sprocket
Old and new next to each other - a new sprocket is about 1.80mm width, this one was 1.66mm, so basically like new and the swap wouldn't have been absolutely necessary.
5:30pm - everything assembled and awesome again



